<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Talking with developers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iquaid.org/2008/04/21/talking-with-developers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iquaid.org/2008/04/21/talking-with-developers/</link>
	<description>... the four laws of humanity ...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: quaid</title>
		<link>http://iquaid.org/2008/04/21/talking-with-developers/#comment-1780</link>
		<dc:creator>quaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iquaid.org/?p=67#comment-1780</guid>
		<description>Good suggestion, thanks.  There actually is stuff happening with JPackage and Fedora, trying to solve these issues.  I'll look into this further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good suggestion, thanks.  There actually is stuff happening with JPackage and Fedora, trying to solve these issues.  I&#8217;ll look into this further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Plana</title>
		<link>http://iquaid.org/2008/04/21/talking-with-developers/#comment-1776</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Plana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iquaid.org/?p=67#comment-1776</guid>
		<description>As a Java developer and Fedora user, I'd be interested to hear about Fedora's current relationship with JPackage.org and where it sees it going. JPackage is my choice of Java package repositories simply because they use java bytecode compiled code instead of gcj ones. Unfortunately, i've found several conflicting things throughout the years. One that's still there is the jpackage-utils conflict in the two. Others are package naming and versioning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Java developer and Fedora user, I&#8217;d be interested to hear about Fedora&#8217;s current relationship with JPackage.org and where it sees it going. JPackage is my choice of Java package repositories simply because they use java bytecode compiled code instead of gcj ones. Unfortunately, i&#8217;ve found several conflicting things throughout the years. One that&#8217;s still there is the jpackage-utils conflict in the two. Others are package naming and versioning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
