<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EPEL package count</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iquaid.org/2008/07/09/epel-package-count/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iquaid.org/2008/07/09/epel-package-count/</link>
	<description>... the four laws of humanity ...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks about Presentation</title>
		<link>http://iquaid.org/2008/07/09/epel-package-count/#comment-2418</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks about Presentation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iquaid.org/?p=101#comment-2418</guid>
		<description>[...] - bookmarked by 1 members originally found by foomonkey on 2008-07-20  EPEL package count  http://iquaid.org/2008/07/09/epel-package-count/ - bookmarked by 1 members originally found by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] - bookmarked by 1 members originally found by foomonkey on 2008-07-20  EPEL package count  <a href="http://iquaid.org/2008/07/09/epel-package-count/" rel="nofollow">http://iquaid.org/2008/07/09/epel-package-count/</a> - bookmarked by 1 members originally found by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quaid</title>
		<link>http://iquaid.org/2008/07/09/epel-package-count/#comment-2356</link>
		<dc:creator>quaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iquaid.org/?p=101#comment-2356</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  I've been curious if some folks were using source rpms and some the final build packages, when doing package count.

For the world of end-users and other package installers, my guess is the interest is in the specific built packages.  That's what they are scrolling through, that is what they are installing, that is what they are counting.

In the end it doesn't matter that much, except for potential confusion.  Oh, yeah, and marketing value. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  I&#8217;ve been curious if some folks were using source rpms and some the final build packages, when doing package count.</p>
<p>For the world of end-users and other package installers, my guess is the interest is in the specific built packages.  That&#8217;s what they are scrolling through, that is what they are installing, that is what they are counting.</p>
<p>In the end it doesn&#8217;t matter that much, except for potential confusion.  Oh, yeah, and marketing value. <img src='http://iquaid.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Schwendt</title>
		<link>http://iquaid.org/2008/07/09/epel-package-count/#comment-2355</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Schwendt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iquaid.org/?p=101#comment-2355</guid>
		<description>Package count is typically done on source rpms with old package releases excluded. Repoview lists 886 (EL4) and 1680 (EL5) source rpms, but that includes old package releases.

http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/4/SRPMS/repoview/
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/SRPMS/repoview/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Package count is typically done on source rpms with old package releases excluded. Repoview lists 886 (EL4) and 1680 (EL5) source rpms, but that includes old package releases.</p>
<p><a href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/4/SRPMS/repoview/" rel="nofollow">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/4/SRPMS/repoview/</a><br />
<a href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/SRPMS/repoview/" rel="nofollow">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/SRPMS/repoview/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
